Ignore the message

In interviews, some people have really good performance, not only the "hardware" qualified, "software" seems to be pretty good. Candidates deal with problems, analyze issues in an orderly manner, Toutoushidao, or even case-story one after another. The bills come in after being genuine, but he found the actual performance and interview performance are very far.

This is mainly because, interview candidates behind in the understanding of the key details of information do not. Listen to interview the candidates in excess of one side of speech, their actual ability to work, enthusiasm and long-term intention to work but do not quite understand, and have access to information of the number of their gold content, but also not known. In fact, the interview is a very difficult work, but people often do not need training and experience that can be qualified, candidates will be able to understand the real situation behind the interview. Comparing with no serious "homework" to the recruitment, the interview is rich in experience and make full preparations for the candidates Duida such as flow, since that would allow experienced staff the wrong impression of the interview, candidates were misled by the superficial. Some interviews will also appear embarrassed even confused the situation, a few hours of interviews Na Buzhun still down, the trip also seemed like not, in the end, do not even know that they asked so many questions in the end to what.

Through interviews of STAR (situation: Situation; task: goal; action: action; result: the results) can effectively test the authenticity of candidate discourse and the underlying information. One of the leading candidates on the issue caused a major case. For example, the ability of the inspection team can ask the following questions: on a practical examples to illustrate your team has the ability » At that time, the team goal is what » In your team What is the role of « You and other members of the team in the relationship between how » Please describe what your team is how to accomplish their tasks » How the results » The team completed its mission in the process of what you have done a contribution » And the other members of your team have any views in conflict situations, how do you overcome the » Do you think the team in the greatest difficulty is what » Through this team, you understand what is the largest .

According to the candidates to answer appropriate to ask, let candidates on key details of the process and conduct a detailed statement by the candidates to answer determine the underlying information. As a result of these issues, particularly the details of the questioning are random, and the layers of wire stripping out cocoon, Shuntengmogua, breaking casseroles asked in the end, the candidates can not be accurately forecast, can not be fully prepared in advance, only factual Answer to. This will greatly reduce the opportunities for candidates to lie, the real level of honesty and components will be reflected.

If the candidates have an ability to team work, done these things, I believe he will certainly talked a lot to bring the issue after a detailed, Yiwuyishi Experience clearly described. If the candidate is lying, may be a reasonable start, with the gradual deepening of the problem, then it may not be justified by.